Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 exam

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 topic 1 question 827 discussion

Exam question from Amazon's AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03

Question #: 827
Topic #: 1

[All AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 Questions]

A company is planning to deploy its application on an Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL Serverless v2 cluster. The application will receive large amounts of traffic. The company wants to optimize the storage performance of the cluster as the load on the application increases.

Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

A. Configure the cluster to use the Aurora Standard storage configuration.
B. Configure the cluster storage type as Provisioned IOPS.
C. Configure the cluster storage type as General Purpose.
D. Configure the cluster to use the Aurora I/O-Optimized storage configuration.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D 🗳️

by haci at March 21, 2024, 8:35 a.m.

Disclaimers:

- ExamTopics website is not related to, affiliated with, endorsed or authorized by Amazon.
- Trademarks, certification & product names are used for reference only and belong to Amazon.

Comments

Submit Cancel

Scheldon

Highly Voted 1 year, 1 month ago

Selected Answer: D

AnswerD For Aurora we have 2 storage type/options: A - Standard B -- I/O-Optimized hence answers B and C options are incorrect. Because customer inform us that there will be a big amount of traffic for their application I would go with I/O-Optimized. Maybe we are giving more $$ per GB-month but we are not paing for I/O operations/request. https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/pricing/ In general question is not precise and it is hard to say which option will be more beneficial (cost effective)

upvoted 6 times

...

GOTJ

Most Recent 4 months, 3 weeks ago

Selected Answer: A

In my opinion, when the company "wants to optimize the storage performance of the cluster AS the load on the application increases" they mean that they EXPECT that the load increases somewhere in the future. If so, what's the point of paying more for the I/O optimised storage configuration from the very beginning? You can switch to this more expensive configuration AS the load increased, saving money before this increment occurs

upvoted 1 times

...

mk168898

9 months ago

Selected Answer: D

Aurora only have: -> Standard -> I/O-Optimized (need optimise storage thats why i chose this)

upvoted 2 times

...

Johnoppong101

11 months ago

Selected Answer: D

Answer is D

upvoted 2 times

...

joseantoniopolo

1 year, 3 months ago

Selected Answer: D

Aurora I/O-Optimized – Improved price performance and predictability for I/O-intensive applications. You pay only for the usage and storage of your DB clusters, with no additional charges for read and write I/O operations.

upvoted 4 times

...

osmk

1 year, 3 months ago

Selected Answer: D

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/AuroraUserGuide/Aurora.Overview.StorageReliability.html#aurora-storage-type

upvoted 2 times

...

JCAWS

1 year, 3 months ago

Selected Answer: D

D is more suitable

upvoted 2 times

...

camps

1 year, 3 months ago

I would choose D

upvoted 2 times

...

TruthWS

1 year, 3 months ago

I think A is true answer

upvoted 2 times

...

xBUGx

1 year, 3 months ago

Selected Answer: D

https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2023/05/amazon-aurora-i-o-optimized/ Aurora I/O-Optimized offers up to 40% cost savings for I/O-intensive applications where I/O charges exceed 25% of the total Aurora database spend.

upvoted 3 times

...

Kaula

1 year, 3 months ago

Selected Answer: C

Agree with haci

upvoted 2 times

...

haci

1 year, 3 months ago

Selected Answer: C

The traffic load is not defined well enough to decide which storage type to use. General Purpose (SSD) storage suits many workloads, including small to medium-sized databases and it is cost-effective. Provisioned IOPS (PIOPS) storage is the highest-performing option available for RDS instances. With Provisioned IOPS storage, you can provision a specific amount of IOPS (input/output operations per second) based on your application’s needs. But here we don't know the amount of requests. So since the question is asking for cost-effective I'll go with C

upvoted 2 times

...