Explicit Deny Overrides Everything - If there is a statement with an Effect: Deny that explicitly denies an action, the action is denied outright, regardless of any "Allow" statements elsewhere in the policy.
Vote C.
The last policy (3° part) deny all actions that are different by ec2:* e s3:GetObject, so the only permsisson are ec2:* e s3:GetObject, based of last policy. This last policy deny the first about allow rds:describe because like i said the only permission is ec2:* e s3:GetObject .
So remain the 2° policy where we have ec2 :* with condition of us-east-1 Region.
The only action allowed are the actions coming that from us-east-1 Region so the the answer is C.
C is the only possible answer for me
NotAction explicitly matches everything except the specified list of actions. So there is EXPLICIT "Deny" for all actions EXCEPT "ec2:*", "s3:GetObject" , which would deny "rds:Describe*" because it is not in the list.
According to AWS policy evaluation logic - "An explicit deny in any policy overrides any allows." - so Allow "rds:Describe*" would be overridden because of the Deny. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/IAM/latest/UserGuide/reference_policies_evaluation-logic.html#policy-eval-denyallow
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/IAM/latest/UserGuide/reference_policies_elements_notaction.html
Agree with AC but D also seems fine - note that policy uses the NotAction element. This means it denies all actions EXCEPT listed in the NotAction array. In this case, all ec2:* actions and the s3:GetObject action are not denied, which means they are allowed.
Sorry I meant D seems fine - so EC2 action AttachNetworkInterface (it falls under ec2:*) is not denied hence allowed, and the user can perform this action in any region, including eu-west-1.
A. Amazon RDS DescribeDBInstances action in the us-east-1 Region: Allowed. The policy grants describe access to all RDS resources (rds:Describe*).
B. Amazon S3 PutObject operation in a bucket named testbucket: Not Allowed. There's no mention of S3 permissions in the policy, and there's a deny statement for s3:GetObject. PutObject likely isn't allowed either.
C. Amazon EC2 DescribeInstances action in the us-east-1 Region: Allowed. The policy allows all EC2 actions (ec2:* ) in the us-east-1 region due to the condition.
D. Amazon EC2 AttachNetworkInterface action in the eu-west-1 Region: Not Allowed. The policy allows EC2 actions only in the us-east-1 region (ec2:* with condition). Actions in any other region (eu-west-1 here) are not allowed due to the deny statement for ec2:*
Therefore, the allowed actions for the IAM user are:
A. Amazon RDS DescribeDBInstances action in the us-east-1 Region
C. Amazon EC2 DescribeInstances action in the us-east-1 Region
A. Amazon RDS DescribeDBInstances action in the us-east-1 Region: Allowed. The policy grants describe access to all RDS resources (rds:Describe*).
B. Amazon S3 PutObject operation in a bucket named testbucket: Not Allowed. There's no mention of S3 permissions in the policy, and there's a deny statement for s3:GetObject. PutObject likely isn't allowed either.
C. Amazon EC2 DescribeInstances action in the us-east-1 Region: Allowed. The policy allows all EC2 actions (ec2:* ) in the us-east-1 region due to the condition.
D. Amazon EC2 AttachNetworkInterface action in the eu-west-1 Region: Not Allowed. The policy allows EC2 actions only in the us-east-1 region (ec2:* with condition). Actions in any other region (eu-west-1 here) are not allowed due to the deny statement for ec2:*
Therefore, the allowed actions for the IAM user are:
A. Amazon RDS DescribeDBInstances action in the us-east-1 Region
C. Amazon EC2 DescribeInstances action in the us-east-1 Region
A. Amazon RDS DescribeDBInstances action in the us-east-1 Region: Allowed. The policy grants describe access to all RDS resources (rds:Describe*).
B. Amazon S3 PutObject operation in a bucket named testbucket: Not Allowed. There's no mention of S3 permissions in the policy, and there's a deny statement for s3:GetObject. PutObject likely isn't allowed either.
C. Amazon EC2 DescribeInstances action in the us-east-1 Region: Allowed. The policy allows all EC2 actions (ec2:* ) in the us-east-1 region due to the condition.
D. Amazon EC2 AttachNetworkInterface action in the eu-west-1 Region: Not Allowed. The policy allows EC2 actions only in the us-east-1 region (ec2:* with condition). Actions in any other region (eu-west-1 here) are not allowed due to the deny statement for ec2:*
Therefore, the allowed actions for the IAM user are:
A. Amazon RDS DescribeDBInstances action in the us-east-1 Region
C. Amazon EC2 DescribeInstances action in the us-east-1 Region
Cannot be C since "ec2" is specifically denied below. Always a deny has priority over an allow statement. The correct answer here is A. The only action that remains allowed is "rds".
Actually I've made some research and it seems like the "NotAction" statement in the Deny block works like an "except" logic. It allows all actions except those specified in the NotAction list. So, it's like saying "deny everything except these actions."
In the end, according to the presented policy, both A and C would be allowed.
After some more consideration I think that if I had to choose between A and C, i would go with C because while the policy explicitly allows the rds:Describe* action, it doesn't restrict it to any particular region (like the answer A suggests).
Final answer: C.
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
igor12ghsj577
5 months ago6022a06
5 months agoAlbanki
5 months agoSysOps4
10 months agopawake8973
1 year agopawake8973
1 year agoklayytech
1 year, 1 month agoklayytech
1 year, 1 month agoklayytech
1 year, 1 month agonightmerv
1 year, 1 month agotgv
1 year agotgv
1 year agotgv
1 year ago