Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 exam

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 topic 1 question 773 discussion

An ecommerce company is running a seasonal online sale. The company hosts its website on Amazon EC2 instances spanning multiple Availability Zones. The company wants its website to manage sudden traffic increases during the sale.

Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

  • A. Create an Auto Scaling group that is large enough to handle peak traffic load. Stop half of the Amazon EC2 instances. Configure the Auto Scaling group to use the stopped instances to scale out when traffic increases.
  • B. Create an Auto Scaling group for the website. Set the minimum size of the Auto Scaling group so that it can handle high traffic volumes without the need to scale out.
  • C. Use Amazon CloudFront and Amazon ElastiCache to cache dynamic content with an Auto Scaling group set as the origin. Configure the Auto Scaling group with the instances necessary to populate CloudFront and ElastiCache. Scale in after the cache is fully populated.
  • D. Configure an Auto Scaling group to scale out as traffic increases. Create a launch template to start new instances from a preconfigured Amazon Machine Image (AMI).
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
Andy_09
Highly Voted 8 months, 1 week ago
Option D
upvoted 8 times
...
[Removed]
Most Recent 4 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: D
The most cost-effective solution is: D. Configure an Auto Scaling group to scale out as traffic increases. Create a launch template to start new instances from a preconfigured Amazon Machine Image (AMI).
upvoted 4 times
...
viejito
4 months, 1 week ago
En la respuesta C : Al usar servicios como Amazon CloudFront y Amazon ElastiCache para almacenar en caché el contenido dinámico, reduciendo la carga en las instancias de Amazon EC2 y mejorando la velocidad de entrega del contenido a los usuarios finales. Esto resulta en una solución más rentable y eficiente en comparación con la respuesta D : simplemente escalar instancias de EC2 sin considerar medidas adicionales para optimizar el rendimiento y reducir los costos . Por lo que la opción correcta es la C .
upvoted 1 times
...
sandordini
5 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: D
Cloudfront coulld be a good idea, but it seems to be a simple scaling scenario.. IMO: D
upvoted 1 times
aditianand
4 months, 2 weeks ago
Don't we need a launch template? How can it just launch from AMI image
upvoted 1 times
...
...
buzzinmumbai
5 months, 4 weeks ago
Answer is D .C is not cost effective to use elasticache .Not sure if you can have ASG as the origin.
upvoted 1 times
...
geraltRebo
6 months ago
Selected Answer: D
Sorry D
upvoted 1 times
...
geraltRebo
6 months ago
Selected Answer: C
Option C
upvoted 1 times
...
TruthWS
6 months, 3 weeks ago
Option D bring a most cost effective
upvoted 1 times
...
JCAWS
6 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: C
C more suitable
upvoted 1 times
...
stephensimudemy
7 months, 4 weeks ago
Selected Answer: D
It's D
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...