Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 exam

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 topic 1 question 764 discussion

A company wants to migrate its three-tier application from on premises to AWS. The web tier and the application tier are running on third-party virtual machines (VMs). The database tier is running on MySQL.

The company needs to migrate the application by making the fewest possible changes to the architecture. The company also needs a database solution that can restore data to a specific point in time.

Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?

  • A. Migrate the web tier and the application tier to Amazon EC2 instances in private subnets. Migrate the database tier to Amazon RDS for MySQL in private subnets.
  • B. Migrate the web tier to Amazon EC2 instances in public subnets. Migrate the application tier to EC2 instances in private subnets. Migrate the database tier to Amazon Aurora MySQL in private subnets.
  • C. Migrate the web tier to Amazon EC2 instances in public subnets. Migrate the application tier to EC2 instances in private subnets. Migrate the database tier to Amazon RDS for MySQL in private subnets.
  • D. Migrate the web tier and the application tier to Amazon EC2 instances in public subnets. Migrate the database tier to Amazon Aurora MySQL in public subnets.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
haci
Highly Voted 8 months ago
Selected Answer: B
I'm between B and C. Since RDS requires an additional configuration for PTR, it adds an operational overhead. So I will go with B. Aurora provides automated backup and point-in-time recovery, simplifying backup management and data protection. Continuous incremental backups are taken automatically and stored in Amazon S3, and data retention periods can be specified to meet compliance requirements. RDS provides the same but first, the users should set a retention period for these backups, allowing historical data recovery in case of accidental data loss or corruption, and point-in-time recovery (PITR) allows users to restore the database to any specific moment within the set retention period.
upvoted 9 times
...
Bwhizzy
Most Recent 2 weeks, 2 days ago
Selected Answer: B
Answer is B. please see below article https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/AuroraUserGuide/aurora-pitr.html
upvoted 1 times
...
kbgsgsgs
2 weeks, 4 days ago
Selected Answer: C
Auroralo maigeuleisyeonhalyeomyeon MySQLboda akitegcheo byeongyeong-i deo pil-yohal su issseubnida. ganeunghamyeon choesohan-ui byeongyeong-eul yocheong 67 / 5,000 Migrating to Aurora may require more architectural changes than MySQL. Request minimal changes if possible.
upvoted 1 times
...
Scheldon
3 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
AnswerB The problem with this question is that we do not have enough information. We can execute task with both AURORA or RDS DB. I will go with AURORA as it is Amazon Proprietary and is developed by AWS teams, hence we do not need to think about updates etc. as it is done by AWS teams.
upvoted 1 times
...
MattBJ
7 months ago
Selected Answer: B
B is the correct option.
upvoted 1 times
...
shahreh1
7 months, 2 weeks ago
B: Amazon Aurora is a fully managed relational database engine that’s compatible with both MySQL and PostgreSQL
upvoted 3 times
...
DEN_ZZ
7 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
PTR, it's Aurora
upvoted 3 times
...
stephensimudemy
7 months, 4 weeks ago
Selected Answer: C
It's C. Strictly speaking, there is no AWS DB call Amazon Aurora "MySQL"
upvoted 1 times
ogerber
7 months, 3 weeks ago
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/AuroraUserGuide/Aurora.AuroraMySQL.html
upvoted 2 times
...
...
hajra313
8 months, 1 week ago
C. This option aligns with the requirements by keeping the web tier in public subnets, migrating the application tier to EC2 instances in private subnets to enhance security, and using Amazon RDS for MySQL in private subnets to meet the database requirements with minimal operational overhead. option A:While migrating the web tier and application tier to EC2 instances in private subnets minimizes exposure to the internet. option B:. Migrating the database tier to Amazon Aurora MySQL introduces changes to the database engine, which might require additional testing and adjustments to the application. Additionally, Aurora MySQL does not directly support point-in-time recovery; instead, it uses continuous backups and snapshots for data recovery.
upvoted 3 times
...
Andy_09
8 months, 1 week ago
Option A works better
upvoted 2 times
...
Andy_09
8 months, 1 week ago
Option B
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...