Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 exam

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 topic 1 question 698 discussion

A company is deploying a new application to Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) with an AWS Fargate cluster. The application needs a storage solution for data persistence. The solution must be highly available and fault tolerant. The solution also must be shared between multiple application containers.

Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?

  • A. Create Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) volumes in the same Availability Zones where EKS worker nodes are placed. Register the volumes in a StorageClass object on an EKS cluster. Use EBS Multi-Attach to share the data between containers.
  • B. Create an Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) file system. Register the file system in a StorageClass object on an EKS cluster. Use the same file system for all containers.
  • C. Create an Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) volume. Register the volume in a StorageClass object on an EKS cluster. Use the same volume for all containers.
  • D. Create Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) file systems in the same Availability Zones where EKS worker nodes are placed. Register the file systems in a StorageClass object on an EKS cluster. Create an AWS Lambda function to synchronize the data between file systems.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
boluwatito
6 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: B
Overall, Amazon EFS provides a highly available, fault-tolerant, and shared storage solution with minimal operational overhead, making it the ideal choice for persisting data in an Amazon EKS Fargate cluster.
upvoted 3 times
...
TruthWS
6 months, 3 weeks ago
B bcs EBS only attack one EC2
upvoted 2 times
...
asdfcdsxdfc
7 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
B looks correct
upvoted 2 times
...
Naveena_Devanga
7 months, 3 weeks ago
B, The solution also must be shared between multiple application containers so attaching to each container is not a practical solution.
upvoted 3 times
...
Marunio
8 months ago
Selected Answer: B
B is correct answer because it is high available - EBS isnt HA for that so A isn't dealing with request.
upvoted 2 times
...
jaswantn
8 months, 1 week ago
Option A... EBS with multi attach does not provide HA so option B is more appropriate.
upvoted 1 times
dkw2342
6 months, 3 weeks ago
It's just plain wrong. Not getting HA with EBS multi attach is really the least of your problems. Mounting a regular FS in read/write mode on more than one machine will cause data corruption. You'd need a clustered filesystem.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Andy_09
8 months, 1 week ago
Correct answer is B
upvoted 3 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...