The on-the-spot choice was C) Spot Instances, but after re-reading the question several times, I realized that the company needs a CONTINUOUSLY running workload for 12 hours. Spot Instances can be interrupted by AWS, making them less reliable.
I think Answes is A - on demand, because - company needs a CONTINUOUSLY running workload
AHAHA, I use AI to check the question, Here is Answer:
The most cost-effective option for running an experimental workload on an Amazon EC2 instance for 12 hours and then stopping it is:
✅ Spot Instances
Than i say - But spot instances can be interrupted by amazon and question have this words "needs to continuously run".
Answer: You're absolutely right! Since the question states that the workload "needs to continuously run" for 12 hours, Spot Instances may not be the best option because they can be interrupted by AWS at any time.
The best cost-effective option in this case would be:
✅ On-Demand Instances
Spot Instances are highly cost-effective and suitable for workloads that can handle interruptions. They allow you to use unused EC2 capacity at a significant discount compared to On-Demand pricing, making them the best choice for experimental or temporary workloads.
C. Spot Instances offer the most cost-effective option for running workloads that are flexible in terms of interruption. These instances allow you to bid for unused EC2 capacity at significantly reduced rates compared to On-Demand Instances. Although Spot Instances can be interrupted by AWS with a two-minute warning, they are well-suited for experimental or non-critical workloads.
Why Spot Instances are a good fit:
They are ideal for short-term workloads.
They provide significant cost savings compared to On-Demand Instances.
The workload can tolerate potential interruptions.
Since the workload is experimental and doesn't explicitly require 100% uptime, Spot Instances are an excellent fit because:
They offer savings of up to 90% compared to On-Demand prices.
The company can configure the workload to stop or save progress if the Spot Instance is interrupted.
C. Spot Instances
Here's why Spot Instances are the best fit:
Experimental workload: Since the workload is experimental and runs for a limited time (12 hours), there's no need for guaranteed uptime associated with On-Demand Instances.
For a company that needs to continuously run an experimental workload on an Amazon EC2 instance and stop the instance after 12 hours, the most cost-effective purchasing option would be C. Spot Instances.
Spot Instances offer the lowest cost compared to On-Demand Instances or Reserved Instances. With Spot Instances, you can take advantage of unused EC2 capacity at a discounted rate. This can be ideal for workloads that are flexible with timing and can tolerate potential interruptions.
The reason for choosing Spot Instances is that they offer the most cost-effective pricing model for workloads with flexible start and stop times. Spot Instances allow users to bid on unused EC2 capacity, often resulting in significantly lower prices compared to On-Demand or Reserved Instances. Since the workload in this scenario is experimental and can be stopped after 12 hours, leveraging Spot Instances enables the company to take advantage of cost savings without compromising performance or reliability. Additionally, Spot Instances can be terminated with a two-minute notification, which aligns well with the requirement to stop the instance after a specific duration. Overall, Spot Instances provide a cost-effective solution for running flexible and transient workloads like experimental tasks.
My initial reaction is A, but is anyone able to explain why not D: Dedicated Host as isnt there a Dedicated host reservation option inside of dedicated host which can be 70% off?
Key Sentence " needs to continuously run" - so continuously and most cost effective is On Demand
On-Demand Instances let you pay for compute capacity by the hour or second (minimum of 60 seconds) with no long-term commitments. This frees you from the costs and complexities of planning, purchasing, and maintaining hardware and transforms what are commonly large fixed costs into much smaller variable costs.
Correct answer is C. Spot Instances
While it’s true that On-Demand Instances can be used for continuous workloads, the key factor here is cost-effectiveness.
In the context of the question, since the workload is experimental and can be stopped after 12 hours, Spot Instances would be the most cost-effective choice, even for a continuous workload. If the workload couldn’t be interrupted, then On-Demand Instances might be a better choice.
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
geocis
Highly Voted 10 months agoHokage25
Most Recent 3 weeks, 1 day agoMady1982
3 months, 1 week agoitem_123_price
3 months, 1 week agoMady1982
3 months, 1 week agoAmin_013
3 months, 2 weeks agoHersheyss
4 months, 1 week agoBirthday_bun
8 months, 1 week agoCyberGirly
9 months agoaron1621
9 months agomoadabdou
10 months, 3 weeks agobd009999
1 year, 2 months agoLinuxChamp
1 year, 2 months agoLinuxChamp
1 year, 2 months agoAdmiralGimme
1 year, 2 months agoCjroblese
1 year, 2 months agoRuffyit
1 year, 2 months agoTravisnica
1 year, 2 months agoSuiSensei
1 year, 4 months ago