exam questions

Exam AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 exam

Exam AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 topic 1 question 165 discussion

A company has a new AWS Direct Connect connection between its on-premises data center and the AWS Cloud. The company has created a new private VIF on this connection. However, the VIF status is DOWN.

A network engineer verifies that the physical connection status is UP and RUNNING based on information from the AWS Management Console. The network engineer checks the customer Direct Connect router and can see the ARP entry for the VLAN interface created for the private VIF at AWS.

What could be causing the private VIF to have a DOWN status?

  • A. ICMP is blocked on the customer Direct Connect router.
  • B. TCP port 179 is blocked on the customer Direct Connect router.
  • C. The IEEE 802.1Q VLAN identifier is misconfigured on the customer Direct Connect router.
  • D. The company has configured IEEE 802.1ad instead of 802.1Q on the customer Direct Connect router.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
ISSDoksim
Highly Voted 1 year, 4 months ago
C - https://docs.aws.amazon.com/directconnect/latest/UserGuide/Troubleshooting.html#ts-layer-2
upvoted 11 times
KidPags
1 month, 2 weeks ago
That doc says as part of troubleshooting to "Verify if the router has a MAC address entry from the AWS endpoint in your address resolution protocol (ARP) table." In this Q the ARP entry exists, so the q-tag must be configured correctly.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Certified101
Highly Voted 1 year, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: B
Changed to B as the entry is visible for the VLAN interface created for the private VIF at AWS, which means that the Layer 2 connectivity appears to be functioning correctly. BGP is the issue
upvoted 8 times
...
woorkim
Most Recent 1 week, 4 days ago
Selected Answer: B
Your virtual interface on Direct Connect can go down for multiple reasons: Physical connection is down or flapping OSI layer 2 configuration issues Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) configuration issues Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) configuration issues https://repost.aws/knowledge-center/direct-connect-down-virtual-interface
upvoted 1 times
...
APTAPT
1 month, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: C
The ARP entry is for private VIF's VLAN interface at AWS, not is for on-premise router. Therefore, the connection at layer 2 cannot be considered normal. Option C is a layer2 problem.
upvoted 1 times
...
APTAPT
1 month, 1 week ago
The ARP entry is for private VIF's VLAN interface at AWS, not is for on-premise router. Therefore, the connection at layer 2 cannot be considered normal. Option C is a layer2 problem.
upvoted 1 times
...
APTAPT
1 month, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: C
The ARP entry is for private VIF's VLAN interface at AWS, not is for on-premise router. Therefore, the connection at layer 2 cannot be considered normal.
upvoted 1 times
...
erima21
2 months ago
Selected Answer: C
However, even if BGP is blocked or misconfigured, this would not cause the VIF status to be "DOWN." The VIF status depends on layer 2 (Ethernet) connectivity, not layer 3. Even if the BGP session is not working, the VIF should be "UP" at layer 2 if the Ethernet frames are being transmitted and tagged correctly.
upvoted 1 times
Spaurito
1 month, 2 weeks ago
If Layer 2 is fine...just walk up the OSI Model...layer 3 is next. Option B
upvoted 1 times
...
...
[Removed]
8 months, 1 week ago
My understanding of the ARP entry is that layer 2 is ok and layer 3 is the problem. Then it would be option B and option C would be ruled out.
upvoted 2 times
[Removed]
8 months, 1 week ago
layer 3/4 to be more precise ;) TCP port 179 would be layer 4.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Newbies
8 months, 3 weeks ago
ISSDoksim is correct. Ans C, DXCON uses VLAN tagging (IEEE 802.1Q) to separate customer traffic on the shared physical connection
upvoted 1 times
...
tromyunpak
8 months, 4 weeks ago
Answer is B - since the VIF uses BGP A is not relevant CD are wrong due to the fact the ARP entry is visible
upvoted 1 times
...
psou7
9 months ago
Answer C
upvoted 2 times
...
vikasj1in
10 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: C
The most likely reason for a private VIF (Virtual Interface) to have a DOWN status is a misconfiguration of the VLAN identifier. When setting up a private VIF, you need to configure the correct IEEE 802.1Q VLAN identifier on both ends, matching the VLAN ID associated with the VIF. If there's a mismatch in VLAN configuration, it can lead to the VIF being down. Option A and Option B are less likely to cause the private VIF to be DOWN. ICMP and TCP port 179 are related to specific networking protocols (ping and BGP, respectively), but the DOWN status is more likely associated with VLAN configuration issues. Option D refers to IEEE 802.1ad (Provider Bridging or Q-in-Q), which is not typically used for AWS Direct Connect connections. Misconfiguration of the VLAN identifier (802.1Q) is a more common issue leading to a DOWN status.
upvoted 2 times
WherecanIstart
10 months ago
Seeing the arp entries on the vlan interface points to the fact that 802.1q is configured correctly.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Becklang
1 year, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: B
As the arp entry can be seen on the customer side which means the dot1.q is correctly configured , so C is wrong
upvoted 3 times
...
unclehou
1 year, 3 months ago
C is correct. TCP port 179 is associated with the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), which is used for routing updates between the customer's router and the AWS Direct Connect router. Blocking port 179 would prevent BGP from establishing a connection, but it would usually result in a BGP DOWN status, not necessarily a DOWN status for the entire private VIF.
upvoted 2 times
...
Certified101
1 year, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: C
If it was B it would show BGP as DOWN not VIF - this is a layer 2 issue Given the ARP entry visibility and physical connection's UP state, it indicates that the Layer 2 configuration (VLAN) might be correct on the Direct Connect router. However, if the VIF status is still showing as DOWN, it can be related to incorrect 802.1Q VLAN configuration, which might have been performed correctly on the customer end, but misconfigured on the AWS side or vice versa. So, the correct answer would be: C. The IEEE 802.1Q VLAN identifier is misconfigured on the customer Direct Connect router.
upvoted 6 times
...
Manh
1 year, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: B
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/directconnect/latest/UserGuide/Troubleshooting.html#ts-layer-2 Ensure that there are no firewall or ACL rules that are blocking TCP port 179 or any high-numbered ephemeral TCP ports. These ports are necessary for BGP to establish a TCP connection between the peers.
upvoted 4 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago