exam questions

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 exam

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 topic 1 question 539 discussion

A company wants to use the AWS Cloud to improve its on-premises disaster recovery (DR) configuration. The company's core production business application uses Microsoft SQL Server Standard, which runs on a virtual machine (VM). The application has a recovery point objective (RPO) of 30 seconds or fewer and a recovery time objective (RTO) of 60 minutes. The DR solution needs to minimize costs wherever possible.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

  • A. Configure a multi-site active/active setup between the on-premises server and AWS by using Microsoft SQL Server Enterprise with Always On availability groups.
  • B. Configure a warm standby Amazon RDS for SQL Server database on AWS. Configure AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) to use change data capture (CDC).
  • C. Use AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery configured to replicate disk changes to AWS as a pilot light.
  • D. Use third-party backup software to capture backups every night. Store a secondary set of backups in Amazon S3.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
1Alpha1
Highly Voted 1 year, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: B
Backup & Restore (RPO in hours, RTO in 24 hours or less) Pilot Light (RPO in minutes, RTO in hours) Warm Standby (RPO in seconds, RTO in minutes) *** Right Answer *** Active-Active (RPO is none or possibly seconds, RTO in seconds)
upvoted 10 times
1Alpha1
1 year, 1 month ago
https://disaster-recovery.workshop.aws/en/intro/disaster-recovery.html#:~:text=Pilot%20Light%20(RPO%20in%20minutes,that%20includes%20that%20critical%20core.
upvoted 4 times
...
...
pentium75
Highly Voted 1 year, 2 months ago
Selected Answer: C
Not A - too expensive and not using AWS services Not B - "RDS for SQL Server" does not support everything that "SQL Server Standard which runs on a VM" does; CDC supports even less (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/dms/latest/userguide/CHAP_Source.SQLServer.html). Also it would be more expensive than C. Not D - "Every night" would not meet the RPO requirement
upvoted 7 times
awsgeek75
1 year, 1 month ago
Thanks I was confused between B and C. This makes perfect sense!
upvoted 1 times
...
...
zdi561
Most Recent 1 month ago
Selected Answer: C
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery (AWS DRS): A service that can replicate entire virtual machines, including your SQL Server instance, to a secondary region for disaster recovery
upvoted 1 times
...
FlyingHawk
1 month, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
AWS DMS with CDC can replicate changes from the on-premises SQL Server to the RDS instance in near real-time, meeting the 30-second RPO requirement. A warm standby RDS instance ensures a faster recovery, meeting the 60-minute RTO requirement. This solution is more cost-effective than upgrading to SQL Server Enterprise and provides a managed, scalable database service.
upvoted 1 times
FlyingHawk
1 month, 2 weeks ago
C - Not optimized for real-time replication, making it challenging to meet the 30-second RPO requirement.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Salilgen
2 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
IMO answer is B. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is cheaper and may meet the RTO/RPO requirements of the question, but option C states that it is configured as a pilot light (RTO/RPO 10s minute)
upvoted 2 times
...
LeonSauveterre
3 months ago
Selected Answer: C
RPO: the maximum acceptable amount of *data loss* during an outage or disaster. RTO: the maximum acceptable amount of *downtime* after a failure. Why B (RDS with DMS) might be better: 1. RTO Guarantee: A warm standby database provides faster recovery since the database is preconfigured and ready to accept traffic. 2. Simplicity: For workloads compatible with RDS and DMS, this approach simplifies management. Why C (Elastic DR) might be better: 1. Workload Compatibility: If the on-premises SQL Server workload uses features that RDS or DMS cannot support, Elastic DR ensures full replication by mirroring the entire VM or disk. 2. Cost: Elastic DR replicates data but does not run a live database, making it much cheaper than a warm standby RDS. "The DR solution needs to minimize costs wherever possible" - That makes me think C is the answer.
upvoted 2 times
FlyingHawk
1 month, 2 weeks ago
Elastic DRS is better suited for applications with less stringent RPO requirements. Achieving a 30-second RPO with this solution could be challenging, as it is not optimized for real-time replication.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
example_
7 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
Pilot light (RPO in minutes, RTO in tens of minutes) Warm standby (RPO in seconds, RTO in minutes) https://docs.aws.amazon.com/wellarchitected/latest/reliability-pillar/rel_planning_for_recovery_disaster_recovery.html
upvoted 2 times
MrAliMohsan
6 months, 3 weeks ago
When cost is a concern, and you wish to achieve a similar RPO and RTO objectives as defined in the warm standby strategy, you could consider cloud native solutions, like AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, that take the pilot light approach and offer improved RPO and RTO targets.
upvoted 3 times
...
...
abhiarns
11 months ago
Selected Answer: C
AWS DRS(AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery) enables RPOs of seconds and RTOs of minutes.
upvoted 2 times
...
osmk
1 year ago
Selected Answer: B
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/whitepapers/latest/disaster-recovery-workloads-on-aws/disaster-recovery-options-in-the-cloud.html#warm-standby
upvoted 3 times
...
awsgeek75
1 year, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: C
A: Not possible B: With RDS it means your failover will launch a different database engine. This is wrong in general D: No comments C: It is a disk based replication so it will be similar DB server and this is the product managed by AWS for the DR of on-prem setups. https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/modernizing-with-aws/how-to-set-up-disaster-recovery-for-sql-server-always-on-availability-groups-using-aws-elastic-disaster-recovery/
upvoted 2 times
...
1rob
1 year, 3 months ago
Selected Answer: C
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery If you are considering the pilot light or warm standby strategy for disaster recovery, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery could provide an alternative approach with improved benefits. Elastic Disaster Recovery can offer an RPO and RTO target similar to warm standby, but maintain the low-cost approach of pilot light From <https://docs.aws.amazon.com/wellarchitected/latest/reliability-pillar/rel_planning_for_recovery_disaster_recovery.html>
upvoted 3 times
...
potomac
1 year, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: B
With the pilot light approach, you replicate your data from one environment to another and provision a copy of your core workload infrastructure, not the fully functional copy of your production environment in a recovery environment.
upvoted 2 times
saymolet
1 year, 2 months ago
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/architecture/disaster-recovery-dr-architecture-on-aws-part-iii-pilot-light-and-warm-standby/
upvoted 3 times
...
pentium75
1 year, 2 months ago
We have no idea if they are using SQL Server features that require OS customization etc., so we can't assume that the app would run on RDS for SQL Server at all. We need a replica of the VM that SQL Server is currently running on, thus C.
upvoted 2 times
...
...
thanhnv142
1 year, 4 months ago
C: Pilot light - In pilot light, databases are always on, thus minimize RPO (can satisfy the 30s requirement) - Only apps are turn off. But it can satisfy the 60 minutes requirement - Warm standby, of cource, can satisfy all the RPO and RTO requirements, but it is more expensive than pilot light
upvoted 4 times
...
richguo
1 year, 5 months ago
Selected Answer: C
B(warm standby) is doable, but C (pilot light) is most cost effectively. https://aws.amazon.com/tw/blogs/architecture/disaster-recovery-dr-architecture-on-aws-part-iii-pilot-light-and-warm-standby/
upvoted 3 times
...
LazyTs
1 year, 6 months ago
Selected Answer: B
The company wants to improve... so needs something guaranteed to be better than 60 mins RTO
upvoted 2 times
...
Guru4Cloud
1 year, 6 months ago
Selected Answer: B
Configure a warm standby Amazon RDS for SQL Server database on AWS. Configure AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) to use change data capture (CDC).
upvoted 3 times
Eminenza22
1 year, 6 months ago
Warm standby is costlier than Pilot Light
upvoted 3 times
...
...
PantryRaid
1 year, 6 months ago
Selected Answer: C
AWS DRS enables RPOs of seconds and RTOs of minutes. Pilot light is also cheaper than warm standby. https://aws.amazon.com/disaster-recovery/
upvoted 3 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago