exam questions

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 topic 1 question 193 discussion

A large education company recently introduced Amazon Workspaces to provide access to internal applications across multiple universities. The company is storing user profiles on an Amazon FSx for Windows File Server file system. The file system is configured with a DNS alias and is connected to a self-managed Active Directory. As more users begin to use the Workspaces, login time increases to unacceptable levels.

An investigation reveals a degradation in performance of the file system. The company created the file system on HDD storage with a throughput of 16 MBps. A solutions architect must improve the performance of the file system during a defined maintenance window.

What should the solutions architect do to meet these requirements with the LEAST administrative effort?

  • A. Use AWS Backup to create a point-in-time backup of the file system. Restore the backup to a new FSx for Windows File Server file system. Select SSD as the storage type. Select 32 MBps as the throughput capacity. When the backup and restore process is completed, adjust the DNS alias accordingly. Delete the original file system.
  • B. Disconnect users from the file system. In the Amazon FSx console, update the throughput capacity to 32 MBps. Update the storage type to SSD. Reconnect users to the file system.
  • C. Deploy an AWS DataSync agent onto a new Amazon EC2 instance. Create a task. Configure the existing file system as the source location. Configure a new FSx for Windows File Server file system with SSD storage and 32 MBps of throughput as the target location. Schedule the task. When the task is completed, adjust the DNS alias accordingly. Delete the original file system.
  • D. Enable shadow copies on the existing file system by using a Windows PowerShell command. Schedule the shadow copy job to create a point-in-time backup of the file system. Choose to restore previous versions. Create a new FSx for Windows File Server file system with SSD storage and 32 MBps of throughput. When the copy job is completed, adjust the DNS alias. Delete the original file system.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
F_Eldin
Highly Voted 1 year, 8 months ago
Selected Answer: A
B is wrong : https://aws.amazon.com/fsx/windows/faqs/#:~:text=A%3A%20While%20you%20cannot%20change,with%20a%20different%20storage%20type. I can modify the capacity, but not the type.
upvoted 17 times
Sab
1 year, 4 months ago
Storage type can be modified https://docs.aws.amazon.com/fsx/latest/WindowsGuide/managing-storage-type.html
upvoted 8 times
...
AK2020
1 year, 3 months ago
You can change your file system storage type from HDD to SSD using the Amazon FSx console or Amazon FSx API. You can't change your file system storage type from SSD to HDD. So A is correct as we can do this during the downtime
upvoted 3 times
AK2020
1 year, 3 months ago
So B is correct. my apologies
upvoted 2 times
...
...
...
Andres123456
Highly Voted 1 year, 3 months ago
Selected Answer: B
Storage type can be modified https://docs.aws.amazon.com/fsx/latest/WindowsGuide/managing-storage-type.html
upvoted 8 times
...
820b83f
Most Recent 21 hours, 40 minutes ago
Selected Answer: A
My reasons for its A: 1. FSx does not support live storage type changes from HDD to SSD. You must create a new file system.
upvoted 1 times
...
bhanus
1 month, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/fsx/latest/WindowsGuide/updating-storage-type.html HDD can be changed to SSd
upvoted 1 times
...
SIJUTHOMASP
1 month, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
Comparing between A and B, the trade-off decision would be on the key requirement for 'least administrative efforts'. Which seems to be lesser in B, because it's single step but on the other hand on A, there are multiple steps of backup, creating new FSx etc should be of more admin efforts. Hence B.
upvoted 1 times
...
pk0619
1 month, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
You can update both throughput capacity as well as storage capacity of an existing filesystem
upvoted 1 times
...
LuongTo
2 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: B
SSD to HDD is impossible, but HDD to SSD is okay => B is feasible. B is less effort since B just disconnects users from the file system for a while, and then updates the FSx. While A needs a new FSx, backup, restore, clean up then switch, more steps to do than A
upvoted 2 times
...
FZA24
3 months ago
Selected Answer: A
Let consider that B is correct (updating storage type is possible). Between A and B, A needs the LEAST administrative effort. A is seamless for users. However, B requires to disconnect users and thus service interruption and administrative effort to manage that!
upvoted 1 times
...
Sin_Dan
3 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: A
I pity those who are selecting B. updating the storage type (from HDD to SSD) is not supported for an existing FSx for Windows File Server file system. You would need to create a new file system to change the storage type. Therefore, this solution is not feasible.
upvoted 1 times
Zinnia_Wang
1 month, 3 weeks ago
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/fsx/latest/WindowsGuide/updating-storage-type.html
upvoted 1 times
...
...
JoeTromundo
4 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: B
"You CAN CHANGE your file system storage type from HDD to SSD using the AWS Management Console and AWS CLI." "You CANNOT CHANGE your file system storage type from SSD to HDD." https://docs.aws.amazon.com/fsx/latest/WindowsGuide/managing-storage-configuration.html#managing-storage-type
upvoted 1 times
...
Syre
5 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: A
Option B would be incorrect because it mentions updating the throughput and storage type directly in the FSx console, which is not supported for an existing FSx for Windows File Server.
upvoted 1 times
helloworldabc
5 months, 2 weeks ago
just B
upvoted 1 times
...
...
dragongoseki
7 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
B is right answer.
upvoted 3 times
...
Helpnosense
7 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
Since hdd to ssd type is doable. B is better answer.
upvoted 1 times
...
Bobshaw
9 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: A
AWS Backup to create a point-in-time backup of the existing file system, restoring the backup to a new FSx for Windows File Server file system with SSD storage and higher throughput capacity, adjusting the DNS alias, and deleting the original file system provides the most efficient and least administratively intensive solution to improve the performance of the file system during a defined maintenance window
upvoted 2 times
...
seetpt
9 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
B is correct
upvoted 1 times
...
titi_r
10 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
It's possible to change storage type from HDD to SSD: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/fsx/latest/WindowsGuide/managing-storage-type.html "B" is correct because it needs less administrative effort.
upvoted 2 times
...
CMMC
11 months ago
Selected Answer: B
change your file system storage type from HDD to SSD using the Amazon FSx console or Amazon FSx API https://docs.aws.amazon.com/fsx/latest/WindowsGuide/managing-storage-type.html
upvoted 3 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago