exam questions

Exam AWS Certified Developer - Associate DVA-C02 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AWS Certified Developer - Associate DVA-C02 exam

Exam AWS Certified Developer - Associate DVA-C02 topic 1 question 39 discussion

A company is planning to securely manage one-time fixed license keys in AWS. The company's development team needs to access the license keys in automaton scripts that run in Amazon EC2 instances and in AWS CloudFormation stacks.
Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

  • A. Amazon S3 with encrypted files prefixed with “config”
  • B. AWS Secrets Manager secrets with a tag that is named SecretString
  • C. AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store SecureString parameters
  • D. CloudFormation NoEcho parameters
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
alohayo
Highly Voted 1 year, 1 month ago
Both B and C are feasible solutions. Just consider the "MOST cost effectively" here. AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store comes with no additional cost (Standard type). However, AWS Secrets Manager costs $0.40 per secret per month, and data retrieval costs $0.05 per 10,000 API calls. C is much cheaper, guy.
upvoted 27 times
...
hanJR
Highly Voted 1 year, 6 months ago
I chose C because AWS Secrets Manager does auto key rotation(The question says that the key is one-time fixed).
upvoted 19 times
...
sumanshu
Most Recent 4 months ago
Selected Answer: C
A) Eliminated - this solution involves additional complexity B) Eliminated - Secrets Manager charges a fee for secret storage and API calls. For one-time fixed license keys, this might be unnecessary overhead. Secrets Manager is more suited for dynamically rotated secrets (e.g., database credentials), not fixed keys. C) Correct: SecureString parameters are free to store unless using advanced features, making it highly cost-efficient. D) Eliminated - Parameters marked with NoEcho are limited to the stack and cannot be accessed programmatically by EC2 instances
upvoted 2 times
...
Freddie26
4 months ago
Selected Answer: C
"One-time fixed license keys" are unique codes provided when purchasing a software license. It's more cost effective to provide this via AWS Systems Manager with secure parameters.
upvoted 1 times
...
65703c1
5 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: C
C is the correct answer.
upvoted 1 times
...
william_cit
7 months ago
It said 'one-time fixed license keys' and 'MOST cost-effectively', so C is better
upvoted 2 times
...
ibratoev
7 months ago
C seems the best fit.
upvoted 2 times
...
s50600822
1 year, 4 months ago
PS prob is free for this use case https://docs.aws.amazon.com/systems-manager/latest/userguide/parameter-store-advanced-parameters.html, even though SM cost may also count to nothing(due to the scale of the use case and caching client). Again the only notable difference is the aforementioned irrelevant tag.
upvoted 3 times
...
Untamables
1 year, 7 months ago
Selected Answer: C
C 'https://docs.aws.amazon.com/systems-manager/latest/userguide/systems-manager-parameter-store.html
upvoted 9 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago