Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 exam

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 topic 1 question 411 discussion

A company has a web application with sporadic usage patterns. There is heavy usage at the beginning of each month, moderate usage at the start of each week, and unpredictable usage during the week. The application consists of a web server and a MySQL database server running inside the data center. The company would like to move the application to the AWS Cloud, and needs to select a cost-effective database platform that will not require database modifications.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

  • A. Amazon DynamoDB
  • B. Amazon RDS for MySQL
  • C. MySQL-compatible Amazon Aurora Serverless
  • D. MySQL deployed on Amazon EC2 in an Auto Scaling group
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
channn
Highly Voted 1 year, 7 months ago
Selected Answer: C
C: Aurora Serverless is a MySQL-compatible relational database engine that automatically scales compute and memory resources based on application usage. no upfront costs or commitments required. A: DynamoDB is a NoSQL B: Fixed cost on RDS class D: More operation requires
upvoted 11 times
...
Buruguduystunstugudunstuy
Highly Voted 1 year, 8 months ago
Selected Answer: C
Answer C, MySQL-compatible Amazon Aurora Serverless, would be the best solution to meet the company's requirements. Aurora Serverless can be a cost-effective option for databases with sporadic or unpredictable usage patterns since it automatically scales up or down based on the current workload. Additionally, Aurora Serverless is compatible with MySQL, so it does not require any modifications to the application's database code.
upvoted 5 times
...
TariqKipkemei
Most Recent 1 year ago
Selected Answer: C
The is a huge demand for auto-scaling which Amazon RDS cannot do. This contributes to the cost savings as Aurora serverless would scale done in low peak times, this contributes to low costs.
upvoted 4 times
...
JKevin778
1 year, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: B
RDS is cheaper than Aurora.
upvoted 1 times
pentium75
10 months, 3 weeks ago
RDS is cheaper than Aurora if you have a fixed instance size, but NOT if you have "unpredictable" usage patterns, then Aurora Serverless (!) is cheaper.
upvoted 5 times
...
...
Guru4Cloud
1 year, 2 months ago
Selected Answer: C
Answer C, MySQL-compatible Amazon Aurora Serverless, would be the best solution to meet the company's requirements.
upvoted 2 times
...
MrAWSAssociate
1 year, 5 months ago
Selected Answer: C
Since we have sporadic & unpredictable usage for DB, Aurora Serverless would be fit more cost-efficient for this case scenario than RDS MySQL. https://www.techtarget.com/searchcloudcomputing/answer/When-should-I-use-Amazon-RDS-vs-Aurora-Serverless
upvoted 1 times
...
antropaws
1 year, 5 months ago
Selected Answer: C
C for sure.
upvoted 3 times
...
klayytech
1 year, 8 months ago
Selected Answer: B
Amazon RDS for MySQL is a cost-effective database platform that will not require database modifications. It makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale MySQL deployments in the cloud. With Amazon RDS, you can deploy scalable MySQL servers in minutes with cost-efficient and resizable hardware capacity². Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service that provides fast and predictable performance with seamless scalability. DynamoDB is a good choice for applications that require low-latency data access¹. MySQL-compatible Amazon Aurora Serverless is an on-demand, auto-scaling configuration for Amazon Aurora (MySQL-compatible edition), where the database will automatically start up, shut down, and scale capacity up or down based on your application's needs³. So, Amazon RDS for MySQL is the best option for your requirements.
upvoted 2 times
klayytech
1 year, 7 months ago
sorry i will change to C , because Amazon RDS for MySQL is a fully-managed relational database service that makes it easy to set up, operate, and scale MySQL deployments in the cloud. Amazon Aurora Serverless is an on-demand, auto-scaling configuration for Amazon Aurora (MySQL-compatible edition), where the database will automatically start up, shut down, and scale capacity up or down based on your application’s needs. It is a simple, cost-effective option for infrequent, intermittent, or unpredictable workloads.
upvoted 3 times
...
...
boxu03
1 year, 8 months ago
Selected Answer: C
Amazon Aurora Serverless : a simple, cost-effective option for infrequent, intermittent, or unpredictable workloads
upvoted 4 times
...
[Removed]
1 year, 8 months ago
Selected Answer: C
cccccccccccccccccccc
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...